The vote at the African Union: Who supported Morocco and who opposed it? Between expected positions and surprises in the competition
The vote at the African Union: Who supported Morocco and who opposed it? Between expected positions and surprises in the competition
ALDAR / Analysis
The behind-the-scenes of the African Union witnessed a crucial vote that revealed the power dynamics and alliances among its member states. The results showed some predictable positions, but also a few surprises in the course of the competition. In the third round of voting, Algeria secured 24 votes, compared to 22 for Morocco, while Egypt garnered only two votes. With the start of the fourth round, the competition became centered between Morocco and Algeria after Egypt’s elimination. The final score stood at 26 votes for Algeria versus 22 for Morocco, with Egypt having cast its votes in favor of Algeria following its withdrawal. This position reflects the continuity of Egypt’s diplomatic stance, as it had already opposed Morocco’s return to the African Union in 2017.
This vote is not surprising given the positions of certain Arab countries within the African Union. In the 2017 vote, Morocco’s return was only supported by Djibouti and Sudan, while other African Arab countries either abstained or supported Algeria. Today, the same scenario repeats itself, compelling Morocco to reassess its regional alliances based on real interests rather than traditional considerations. On the other hand, Morocco received support from francophone-oriented countries. However, five of its allies abstained from voting for political reasons: Guinea, Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, and Gabon.
This vote reaffirms a fundamental truth: Morocco cannot rely on the support of Arab countries within African institutions. It must continue to anchor its presence in Africa and strengthen its partnerships with Europe and the Atlantic space. The Moroccan strategy, based on expanding relations beyond traditional frameworks, has proven to be the right option. The next step requires an even more pragmatic approach toward its environment, particularly concerning countries that adopt hostile positions toward it.
